Will your checking account pay for the next bank bailout?

Be very afraid: there’s a bank­ing cri­sis in Cyprus.

Huh?

The banks in Cyprus are in des­per­ate straits – so des­per­ate that, over this past week­end, rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the “troi­ka” (Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund, Euro­pean Union and the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank) flew to the Mediter­ranean island to engi­neer an emer­gency bailout of its largest banks. The scene has become a famil­iar one in the Euro­zone, so famil­iar that Wall Street already has shrugged it off as just anoth­er sideshow in the glob­al bank­ing circus.

But this sideshow may just be worth watch­ing, because this bailout is being financed in large part by funds that peo­ple have on deposit in their check­ing and sav­ings accounts. Under the plan, the troi­ka will ride to the res­cue but only if the gov­ern­ment of Cyprus helps out by con­fis­cat­ing mon­ey that Cypri­ot con­sumers and oth­ers have deposit­ed in the country’s banks.

But Cyprus doesn’t have an FDIC that insures their deposits, do they? Actu­al­ly, deposits are insured up to 100,000 euro. But not if the bailout hap­pens. Under the plan, the gov­ern­ment will extract 6.75 per­cent from accounts up to the insured amount of 100,000 euro and 9.9% for deposits in excess of that insured amount . So a Cypri­ot fam­i­ly that has man­aged to set aside, say, 10,000 euro ($13,000) in a “gov­ern­ment-insured” sav­ings account will lose 675 euro ($878) once the plan is imple­ment­ed. So much for deposit insurance.

So how did Cypri­ots react? The same way you would: they flocked to their local ATMs to get out as much of their mon­ey as they could, quick­ly drain­ing them of avail­able Euros (Mon­day was a bank holiday).

How did the gov­ern­ment respond? By announc­ing that the banks would remain closed until at least Thurs­day . So that calmed every­one down, right?

March 18 2013 image Cyprus banks

Well, maybe not so much, as the Reuters pho­to shows.

And the clam­or isn’t lim­it­ed to the cit­i­zens of Cyprus. The Econ­o­mist called the plan “unfair, short-sight­ed and self-defeat­ing”. The Russ­ian gov­ern­ment, home to many sketchy busi­ness­es that alleged­ly laun­der their mon­ey through the island’s banks, is pre­dictably out­raged. There are even reports from Greek sources that Russ­ian ener­gy titan Gazprom may try to pull togeth­er its own alter­na­tive to the Troika’s bailout .

Suf­fice it to say that the Bailout Bunch has real­ly stepped in it this time. They very well may use the next cou­ple of days of shut­tered banks and emp­ty ATMs to devise a Plan B.

But even if they back off this time, there is a les­son in this for all of us. The glob­al finan­cial cri­sis hasn’t so much end­ed as gone dor­mant. Like an active vol­cano, there are occa­sion­al hic­cups and belch­es, but no erup­tion. Until the next erup­tion. Gov­ern­ments can and will take extra­or­di­nary steps to mit­i­gate the con­se­quences of that erup­tion, but they are run­ning out of ways to prop up fail­ing banks while dis­guis­ing the cost of these bailouts from con­sumers and taxpayers.

The last big bailout of US banks result­ed in (tem­porar­i­ly) high­er fed­er­al deficits, extra­or­di­nar­i­ly (and con­tin­u­ing) low bor­row­ing rates for banks, a bloat­ed Fed­er­al Reserve bal­ance sheet, stub­born­ly high rates of unem­ploy­ment and slug­gish eco­nom­ic growth that may end up last­ing a decade.

In oth­er words, we paid (and are still pay­ing) for the last erup­tion. Those costs can seem dis­tant and abstract. Until they come for your check­ing account.