Unemployment Benefits and Harry Reid’s Pain

Harry Reid has embraced the pain of sequestration in his proposal to extend jobless benefits. But does it address the problem? [Credit: Roll Call]

Har­ry Reid has embraced the pain of seques­tra­tion in his pro­pos­al to extend job­less ben­e­fits. But does it address the prob­lem? [Cred­it: Roll Call]

“I think it’s real­ly unfair that it would be so easy to turn the sequester around and allow us to do some­thing for the long term to take care of this issue. But no, the Repub­li­cans like the pain. They like the pain.”  — Sen­ate Major­i­ty Leader Har­ry Reid, April 24, 2013

Har­ry Reid (D‑NV) has late­ly embraced the pain of sequester. On Thurs­day, Reid advanced a pro­pos­al to off­set the cost of extend­ing “emer­gency” unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits with auto­mat­ic cuts in med­ical spend­ing for the elder­ly and dis­abled. Con­tin­ue read­ing →

America’s Shrinking Workforce

Unemployment officeAmer­i­ca had a bad week. We once again were remind­ed that ter­ror­ism rep­re­sents a con­tin­u­ing threat, that indi­vid­u­als poi­soned by hate­ful ide­ol­o­gy can inflict great harm. We were also remind­ed that we are capa­ble of respond­ing to these bru­tal acts, as Pres­i­dent Oba­ma said, “Self­less­ly. Com­pas­sion­ate­ly. And unafraid.”

Ter­ror­ism presents a chal­lenge to which we’ve yet to for­mu­late a durable response. We remain vul­ner­a­ble, despite the government’s con­tin­ued efforts to keep us safe.

There is anoth­er prob­lem, less hor­rif­ic in its imme­di­ate effects but no less intractable, that also is get­ting the bet­ter of us: the prob­lem of job­less­ness. Con­tin­ue read­ing →